Judge James Boasberg ruled that Meta does not hold a monopoly in social media advertising, citing increased competition from TikTok and YouTube.
Antitrust Ruling Details
The case, initiated five years ago by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), argued Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp cemented its market dominance. However, Boasberg determined that the FTC failed to demonstrate that Meta maintains monopoly power today. The judge noted new competitors like TikTok have emerged significantly altering the landscape.
- Boasberg ruled on 2025-11-18 that FTC did not prove current monopoly.
- Meta acquired Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014.
- FTC cited past statements from Mark Zuckerberg as indicative of strategy.
Despite previous dominance, users are increasingly spending time on TikTok and YouTube, pressuring Meta to invest in competing features. Boasberg's decision negates the need for Meta to divest parts of its business.
Competition Landscape
Boasberg highlighted the shift towards video content, with TikTok and YouTube leading the charge. These platforms now serve as direct competitors to Meta, reducing its control over user time and advertising. The ruling aligns with broader trends of Big Tech companies avoiding the most severe penalties due to rapidly evolving markets.
This development marks a pivotal point, emphasizing the dynamic nature of digital platform competition and its implications for regulatory actions.
