In a significant development within the Epic v. Google case, Judge James Donato has articulated a firm commitment to dismantling what he describes as the monopolistic practices surrounding Alphabet Inc’s (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Google Play Store. This statement comes in the wake of a federal jury’s unanimous ruling eight months prior, which deemed Google’s Android app store an illegal monopoly.
During the final hearing on remedies, Judge Donato addressed Google’s concerns regarding the potential costs and complexities of opening its platform to rival app stores. He firmly dismissed these arguments, asserting, “We’re going to tear the barriers down, it’s just the way it’s going to happen.” His remarks underscored a broader intention to reshape the current landscape, which he characterized as a product of monopolistic conduct. “The world that exists today is changing,” he added, signaling a shift towards greater competition.
Proposed Remedies and Ongoing Discussions
As the proceedings continue, Judge Donato is expected to deliver his final ruling in just over two weeks. In the interim, discussions have centered around the remedies proposed by Epic Games, which include allowing rival stores to operate within the Google Play Store and granting them access to all applications available on the platform.
While both parties acknowledge the feasibility of opening up the Play Store, they remain at odds regarding the specifics, including the timeline, associated costs, and whether Google should retain the authority to review every app from competing stores prior to their inclusion in the Play Store.
Ensuring Fairness and Compliance
In a bid to ensure fairness, Judge Donato has indicated plans to prohibit any discriminatory practices by Google towards rival app stores, particularly concerning human reviews. He has also suggested the establishment of a “technical compliance and monitoring committee” tasked with overseeing the technical aspects of this transition and reporting back to the court every 90 days.
In a recent interview, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney drew parallels between the legal challenges posed by Google and those faced with Apple, remarking that while Apple’s “antitrust trickery” was largely contained within its operations, Google’s practices were more expansive and outward-facing. Sweeney expressed satisfaction with the trial’s outcomes, noting that it validated his long-held suspicions about Google’s behind-the-scenes maneuvers.