During a three-hour hearing in San Francisco on Wednesday, US District Judge James Donato signaled a significant shift may be on the way for Google’s Play Store. The judge is contemplating a mandate that would require the Play Store for Android devices to provide consumers with the option to download alternative app stores.
This scrutiny follows a jury’s December verdict that deemed the Play Store a monopoly after a four-week trial. The ruling highlighted Google’s near-total control over app distribution for Android devices and the billing systems that facilitate digital transactions, a lucrative operation generating billions in annual revenue for the tech giant.
Google's Concerns and Judge's Determination
In response to the judge’s potential directives, Google has raised concerns about the risks associated with third-party app stores, warning of possible security threats and the potential for “security chaos” stemming from malicious software. However, Judge Donato has remained steadfast in his belief that a substantial overhaul of the Play Store is necessary, even if it leads to significant financial implications for Google, which estimates compliance costs could reach as high as $0 million (£467 million).
“We are going to tear the barriers down, that is going to happen,” Judge Donato asserted to Google attorney Glenn Pomerantz. “When you have a mountain built out of bad conduct, you are going to have to move that mountain.” He aims to issue an order detailing the framework for these changes within the coming weeks.
Implications for Future Antitrust Cases
The tactics employed by Google during this penalty phase may offer insights into its strategy for upcoming “remedy hearings” related to a larger antitrust case, where a judge has already labeled the search engine as an illegal monopoly. These hearings, which will focus on the core of Google’s business, are set to commence on September 6 in Washington, D.C.
Timeline for Compliance
As Judge Donato deliberates, he is also considering how much time Google should be allotted to implement the necessary changes to its Android operating system and Play Store. Google has requested a timeline of 12 to 16 months to ensure a seamless transition, minimizing any potential disruptions to Android smartphone performance. In contrast, Epic Games, the video game company that initiated the antitrust lawsuit leading to the Play Store’s monopoly designation, argues that Google could complete the required adjustments in approximately three months at a cost of around $ million (£778,000).