Dark and Darker’s return to Steam should have been cause for celebration. After a legal dispute with Nexon saw it removed from the platform in 2023, developer Ironmace was finally able to get it back on the store last week. Unexpectedly, it also shed its price, relaunching instead as a free-to-play deal. And that’s where the trouble began.
See, Dark and Darker isn’t really free to play. What free players get is a restrictive mode that offers a stripped-down version of the full Dark and Darker experience. It’s not uncommon for free-to-play games to restrict free players in various ways, though many simply sell cosmetics and conveniences to earn revenue. But the free-to-play version of Dark and Darker feels more like a demo.
Ironmace quickly responded to the criticism. The developer says that “the game was always a paid product, and we intend for the full experience to remain this way.” Why, then, is it listed as free to play? Ironmace does have an answer, but frankly, it’s a poor one. “The main reason we released our game as Free to Play (F2P) was because we made a promise to our early loyal adopters on Blacksmith [the standalone client], that we’d do everything possible to not force them to repurchase the game again if it went to major platforms. We do not believe in double-dipping or taking advantage of our fans who are the sole reason we’ve come this far.”
Rather than distribute Steam and Epic keys to Blacksmith players, which it says “was not feasible nor fair to our platform partners,” it launched it as free to play, and eventually Blacksmith players will be able to link their accounts. So to avoid “technical, logistical and contractual hurdles,” Ironmace advertised a game that it still considers a “paid product” as a free-to-play game. Hmmm.
Ironmace's Response and Plans
So free players can only play in Normal mode because this is not actually designed to be a free-to-play game. Ironmace also lists another reason: “A secondary reason for restricting free players to the Normal mode was to act as a barrier, and lower the incentives for hackers to disrupt the game.”
According to Ironmace, hackers largely target High-Roller dungeons, so limiting free accounts to Normal mode was “a preventative measure to try and compartmentalize the damage they could do.” Most players aren’t hackers, though, so limiting their access to the game to mitigate the potential damage caused by a minority of troublemakers seems questionable.
It’s worth noting that Normal mode was not designed exclusively for the free-to-play version. It was added in November, and Ironmace claims it’s a “fan favourite.” I can’t imagine wanting to play a loot-driven game where I can’t use my loot, but apparently “Blacksmith players saw the mode as a solution to a divisive item gap disparity and many viewed the mode as the most fair and balanced mode rather than a limiting system.” I guess it takes all sorts. Some people get enjoyment out of playing Dark Souls on bongos. People are weird.
Ironmace admits it got it wrong, though. “Despite our intentions, we failed in anticipating the expectations that new players would have when approaching our game. We did not intend to deceive our players, and we now realize that the current Normal/High Roller bifurcation is not well designed for F2P players. We built a full loot extraction game and then forced upon a large contingent of the player-base the inability to utilize their hard-earned loot without any workarounds. We now understand the absurdity of that situation and are looking to make amends.”
Naturally, this isn’t going to happen overnight, but it looks like Ironmace wants to come up with a compromise quickly.
